Achieving Logic Verification Closure in State-Dependent RTL Designs through Optimized Test Sequences
Keywords:
State-Dependent RTL Design, Logic Verification, Verification Closure, Test Sequence Optimization, Model-Based Testing, Constraint-Based Testing, Automated Verification Tools, Formal Verification, Hardware-Accelerated VerificationAbstract
State-dependent RTL (Register Transfer Level) design verification presents unique challenges due to its dynamic nature and extensive state space. Achieving logic verification closure in these designs requires innovative strategies and optimized test sequences to ensure comprehensive coverage and correctness. This paper addresses the complexities inherent in state-dependent RTL designs and explores various optimization techniques for test sequences, including algorithmic test generation, model-based testing, constraint-based testing, and the application of machine learning and AI. The integration of automated tools is examined for their role in streamlining verification processes and reducing manual effort. Future trends such as hardware-accelerated verification, continuous verification practices, and enhanced coverage metrics are discussed, highlighting their potential to refine and improve the verification process. The holistic approach outlined in this paper leverages a combination of verification methodologies to provide a robust framework for achieving verification closure, ensuring that state-dependent RTL designs meet specified requirements and perform reliably under all conditions. This research contributes to advancing the field of RTL design verification by providing insights and practical solutions for optimizing test sequences and integrating advanced verification tools.
References
Bjesse, P., Claessen, K., Sheeran, M., & Singh, S. (2005). "Lava: Hardware Design in Haskell". Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming (ICFP), 174-184.
Bryant, R. E. (1992). "Symbolic Simulation - Techniques and Applications". Proceedings of the 29th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, 517-521.
Clarke, E. M., Grumberg, O., & Peled, D. A. (1999). Model Checking. MIT Press.
Anantharaj, T.V., Raj, M., & Lakshmi Narayanan, G. (2020). Reliable coplanar full adder in quantum-dot cellular automata using five-input majority logic. Journal of Nanophotonics, 14(2), 026017. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.14.026017
Ghosh, S., Fujita, M., & Scholl, C. (2004). "Automated Design Verification: A State of the Art Review". Journal of Electronic Testing, 20(3), 213-239.
Ho, R., Dally, W. J., & Poulton, J. (2001). "High-Speed Signaling: Jitter Modeling, Analysis, and Budgeting". IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 48(9), 1183-1198.
Anantharaj, T.V., Sekar, K.R., Raj, R., Venkitachalam, A., & Gopalakrishnan, G. (2022). Reliable quantum-dot cellular automata coplanar adder and subtractor for multi-bit designs. In 2022 13th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT54827.2022.9984221
Katz, Y., & Oppenheimer, A. (2012). "Formal Verification of Hardware". Handbook of Formal Methods, Springer, 467-505.
Anantharaj, T.V., Raj, M., & Gopalakrishnan, L. (2020). Energy-efficient coplanar adder and subtractor in QCA. In 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT) (pp. 539-544). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSIT48917.2020.9214274
Mishchenko, A., Chatterjee, S., & Brayton, R. K. (2006). "DAG-Aware AIG Rewriting: A Fresh Look at Combinational Logic Synthesis". Proceedings of the 43rd ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), 532-535.
Anantharaj, T.V., Sekar, R., Raj, M., & Gopalakrishnan, L. (2022). Optimal test sequences for logic verification closure in state-dependent RTL digital designs. In 2022 13th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. DOI:10.1109/ICCCNT54827.2022.9984212
Nam, G. J., Sakallah, K. A., & Rutenbar, R. A. (2002). "A New FPGA Detailed Routing Approach via Search-Based Boolean Satisfiability". IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 21(6), 674-684.
Paul, B., & Wen, X. (2010). "Delay Testing for Nanometer ICs: Challenges and Solutions". Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), 146-151.
Perry, D. (2004). VHDL: Programming by Example. McGraw-Hill.
Rajski, J., Tyszer, J., & Kassab, M. (2012). Test Compression and Test Resource Partitioning for System-on-Chip Testing. Springer.
Anantharaj, T.V., Raj, M., & Gopalakrishnan, L. (2020). Functional verification closure using optimal test scenarios for digital designs. In 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT) (pp. 535-538). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSIT48917.2020.9214097
Sarangi, S., & Kundu, S. (2013). "A Survey of Formal Methods for Hardware Verification". ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(3), 1-34.
Wile, B., Goss, J., & Roesner, W. (2005). Comprehensive Functional Verification: The Complete Industry Cycle. Morgan Kaufmann
